That's an excellent and very practical question. The price comparison between metal and polymer (plastic) urban trash cans isn't just about the initial sticker price; it's about long-term value. So, let's break it down.
Initially, polymer trash cans almost always have a lower purchase price. They are less expensive to manufacture and transport, making them an attractive choice for budget-conscious projects or temporary installations. You might pay significantly less upfront compared to a similarly sized stainless steel or coated metal bin.
However, the metal trash can often wins when you consider total cost of ownership. Here’s why:
* Durability & Vandalism: Metal bins, especially heavy-gauge stainless steel or coated steel, are much more resistant to impact, cutting, and fire. A polymer can may crack in extreme cold or warp from heat/vandalism, requiring replacement sooner.
* Theft & Weight: Metal bins are extremely heavy, making them hard to steal. Lightweight polymer bins can sometimes be carried away.
* Longevity: A well-made metal bin can last 15-20 years or more with minimal maintenance, while a polymer bin in a high-traffic urban area might need replacement in 5-10 years.
* Aesthetics & Maintenance: Metal offers a sleek, permanent, and often more upscale look. While it can scratch, it doesn't fade like colored plastic and can be cleaned to look new. Polymer is prone to fading, scuffing, and can retain odors.
So, to directly compare: Think of polymer as a lower capital expense. It's a good fit for parks, pathways, or areas with lower abuse risk where initial savings are critical. Metal is a higher initial investment but a lower long-term expense. It's the go-to for city centers, transit hubs, and high-vandalism areas where durability and reduced replacement cycles save money over decades.
Ultimately, the "cheaper" option depends on your timeline. For a short-term solution, choose polymer. For a permanent, resilient fixture, metal usually provides greater value despite its higher upfront price.